New. No comments posted here yet. Be the first one!
Before you go, think about this…
Raymond Spier suggests some meaningful questions to be addressed by IDers. Is it intelligent for a designer to have to eliminate 70 per cent of existing species 250 million years ago, and 90 per cent 65 million years ago? Is it intelligent to design humans as a viciously competitive species, given to the genocidal elimination of neighbouring or endogenous sects? Is it intelligent to design humans who believe different gods, each of which they imagine is the one and true god? Natural selection has not yet answered all the questions that face it, but research will answer these questions. For ID, the very questions it invites make a nonsense of it. Steve Kirk adds that human knees and backs are hardly fit for purpose, and would leave any designer open to litigation on those grounds.
Support independent publishers and writers snubbed by big retailers. Ask your public library to order these books.
Available through all good bookshops
Permission to copy for personal use is granted. Teachers and small group facilitators may also make copies for their students and group members, providing that attribution is properly given. When quoting, suggested attribution format:
Adding the date accessed also will help future searches when the website no longer exists and has to be accessed from archives… for example…
Dr M D Magee, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Sun Gods as Atoning Saviours” Updated: Monday, May 07, 2001, www.askwhy .co .uk / christianity / 0310sungod .php (accessed 5 August, 2007)
Electronic websites please link to us at http://www.askwhy.co.uk or to major contents pages, if preferred, but we might remove or rename individual pages. Pages may be redisplayed on the web as long as the original source is clear. For commercial permissions apply to AskWhy! Publications.
Faith is clearly not enough for many people. They crave hard evidence, scientific proof. They long for the scientific seal of approval, but are unwilling to put up with the rigorous standards of evidence that impart credibility to that seal. What a relief it would be — doubt reliably abolished.
