This Month
Date 09-02-2012
Time 03:08:06

Christian Heresy

The Medieval Inquisition 4

Abstract

The purpose of the Inquisition was terrorism. It was meant to intimidate people into abandoning Catharism. Its terrorist methods were threats, torture, imprisonment and impoverishment, with burning alive the ultimate punishment. If anyone was denounced for heresy to the inquisitors, the best thing they could do was to go at once and declare themselves as heretics and abjure their supposed heresy. Denial meant horrible torture and certain death for those who persisted in it, even if they were telling the truth! Besides those who died at the stake, many died in prison, and their dependents were impoverished. The Inquisition must have fined, imprisoned, tortured, and even slain a large number of honest Christians.
Page Tags: Inquisition, Inquisitors, Heretics, Heresy, Pope Geegory, Methods of Torture, Victims, Accused, Burning Alive, Christian, Church, Death, Innocent, Pope, Popes, Secular Arm, Torture, Victim
Site Tags: Christianity CGText Solomon sun god dhtml art Israelites Belief argue Site A-Z inquisition contra Celsum God’s Truth Jesus Essene tarot Hellenization Joshua
Loading
Genesis 12, 20 and 26 tell the same story in different situations, the first two focussing on Sara, the wife of Abraham, and the last on Rebekah. The Holy Ghost has a short memory or has a poor imagination, being so short of plots.
It is rating one’s conjectures at a very high price to roast a man alive on the strength of them.
Michel de Montaigne (1533-92)

© Dr M D Magee
Contents Updated: Thursday, 12 December 2002
Thursday, 01 June 2006

Methods of Torture

Brazier. Christians were fond of burning people

The inquisitors, with great humanity, always showed the man or woman the instruments of torture first. These were usually a scourge for flogging, a rack for pulling the limbs until the joints cracked, a strappado and a brasier of burning coals to be applied to bare feet. The strappado was an arrangement by which the victim was suspended, with their hands tied behind their back, by the wrists from the ceiling, and jerked downward if they refused to admit the charge. As a further inducement heavy weights would be tied to their feet. Strong men died from it.

Burning to Death

Burning at the stake was not considered torture but a judicial death. Fire and heat were used to torture people. They would be clamped in stocks, their feet and lower legs greased, then a fire would be built under them to fry them. Heated boots and frying people in pans were also used.

If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.
John 15:6
And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.
Leviticus 20:14
And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire.
Leviticus 21:9

The first Christian emperor, taking his cue from Leviticus not the New Testament, started the long standing Christian fashion for burning people. A slave had had intercourse with a free woman. Constantine ordered him to be burnt alive. Many people in Christendom were subsequently burnt alive, even in Britain (See box).

Burning Alive
A case in point is that of John Hooper, Lord Bishop of Gloucester, a Somerset man educated at Cleeve. Hooper was a Zwinglian Protestant, of such a puritanical inclination that he would not swear the vows of the bishop because he had to swear “by the saints”. The boy king, Edward VI (1547-1553), struck out the offending words personally. He also refused to wear the vestments but eventually was persuaded that they did not matter except on ceremonial occasions.

So, a bishop he became, but Catholicism was not yet dead in Britain and Mary I (1553-1558) who was married to Philip II (1556-1598) of Spain came to the throne when her brother Edward died young. Mary was a staunch Catholic, and though there was no Holy Office in the kingdom, she immediately revived the rescinded laws on heresy and had senior clerics like Cranmer and Hooper arrested under them. Both these were burnt alive. Hooper died in 1555 before 7000 spectators and his horrible death is paraphrased here from a description by Henry Moore in a Protestant martyrology of 1809.

The portly bishop who was in his fifties, stripped to the waist and was affixed to the stake by a single iron band, refusing the two others. The hoop was too short and he had to draw in his stomach to allow the band to be fixed. His paunch hung over the top of it. He had a pound of gunpowder in a bladder in his groin and a pound similarly also under each arm. The man laying the reeds for the pyre asked forgiveness and the bishop told him there was no need. It was his duty and God forgave him. The man then continued to throw up the reeds in a pile about the Lord Bishop. Hooper caught bundles of the reeds and put them too under each arm.

The command to light the pyre came but it burned poorly, many of the reeds being green. The day was also cold (it was February) and a brisk wind was blowing the flames flat rather than allowing them to rise. Drier tinder was brought and a fiercer fire built causing the gunpowder to flash. Hooper remained alive. In pain, he now prayed in a loud voice: “Lord Jesus, have mercy on me. Lord Jesus, receive my spirit”. He continued to repeat these words, the last he ever spoke. Even when his face had completely blackened, and his tongue had swollen so that he could no longer be heard, his lips could be seen moving until they were shrunk to the gums. He began to knock his breast with his hands, but one of his forearms soon fell off, leaving him pummelling his chest with the other. Fat, water and blood oozed from his finger ends and splashed about with his movements.

More tinder had to be brought as the fire died down. Hooper was losing his strength and he thrust his hand into the iron hoop around his waist. Now the whole of the lower part of his body was burnt away, and then his guts burst out of his paunch, falling over the hoop, and shortly after he keeled over the hoop and fell into the embers, raising a horrified yell from the crowd. It took almost an hour for the bishop to die on the pyre.

The Pulley The strappado or pulley

The torture of the pulley was called the first torture of the Inquisition. The victim was stripped and his hands tied behind his back. A strong rope was fastened to his wrists and passed over a pulley in the ceiling. The torturers pulled on the rope until the victim was raised from the ground, his arms twisting back above his head, causing immense pain and dislocation. He was suspended about six feet from the floor and occasionally the rope was momentarily released to jerk the suspended figure causing more pain and dislocation if it had not happened already. If no confession was forthcoming, about 100 lbs of weights were added to the victim’s legs and the victim allowed to drop from near the ceiling, again the fall being held to jerk the prisoner. The torture was repeated until the victim confessed or fell unconscious. Arms were invariably disjointed, but doctors would set them back in place so that the torture could be “continued” on another occasion.

The rack

It was a wooden structure about three feet from the ground and about eight feet long, looking like a ladder placed on a table or box. This was because there were cross pieces upon which the victim would lay. At each end of the ladder were rollers to which the victim’s wrists and ankles were tied. If the victim did not respond to the Quaestio then the executioners inserted long wooden poles into holes in the rollers and with a lot of leverage turned them to tension the victim’s bonds. The minimum effect was to have wrists and ankles torn by the cords, but refusal to confess led to dislocation of the joints and even to having limbs torn off.

The Rack
Jane Bohorquia, a woman of noble family from Sevilla, made the mistake merely of talking to a friend about Protestantism. Even though she was pregnant, she was imprisoned until the child was born, then was immediately racked until the cords cut through her flesh to the bones of her wrist, and she began to vomit blood. In a week she was dead. The Inquisition posted a notice that she was found dead in prison with no mention of her torture. The notice added that the Inquisition had found she was innocent and no further action would be taken against her. Her confiscated possessions were returned to her heirs.

John Coustos in Lisbon was racked several times in different ways by the inquisition in 1743, accused of Freemasonry. His shoulders were dislocated more than once and were set back in place by surgeons. Although tortured several times and between times allowed to recover, he would not confess and was eventually sentenced to four years in the galleys and banishment. Thus he lived to tell his tale.

Plainly the torturers were sadists, but so too were the inquisitors. Human beings were no different then from us now, and they had the same imagination. Those of them who took the chance to free young women to force them to be sex slaves in their own private seraglios (see box) certainly did not lack the imagination to see ahead a little private pleasure. It is absurd to think these people were not aware of the pain they were inflicting.

Seraglio
When Napoleon’s general, De Legal, took Aragon, he opened the doors of the Holy Office and released 400 prisoners. The soldiers were astonished to find that sixty of them were beautiful women, the seraglio of the three principle officers of the Inquisition. One of them later married one of the French officers and told her story in detail…

At the age of fifteen on a visit she was introduced to one of the inquisitors who took a fancy to her. That same night her house was raided by the Inquisition. Her father was terrified and when he realised it was his daughter they wanted, he readily surrendered her. She was taken off expecting to die, but found herself ushered into an opulent apartment. A maid offered her sweets and cinnamon tea poured from a silver teapot. Asked when she was to die, the maid seemed astonished she should think it, saying she would live like a princess, except that she would not be free to leave the apartment. The maid had been assigned to her and begged her to be kind.

The inquisitor, Don Francisco, sent her elegant clothes and presents. Then she had endearing letters and finally an invitation to dinner, which the maid urged her to accept. Over dinner, the inquisitor told her she had been accused and found guilty of religious infelicities for which the punishment was burning alive in a “dry pan with a gradual fire”, but he had managed to stay the sentence out of regard for her family and pity for her. She could escape death, however!

The maid urged her to agree and took her to see the torture chamber. Within it was an oven lit by a fire, with a large brass pan on it, with a cover and a lock. There was also a large wheel set with razors, and a pit full of poisonous animals. The maid explained that heretics were put naked into the pan and the lid locked. The torturer lit a small fire in the oven, then gradually fed it until it gre bigger and bigger, thus cooking the victim alive. The wheel was to cut into pieces anyone who spoke against the Holy Office of the Inquisition or the pope. The pit was for general disrespect for holy images and the people of the Church. The maid urged her to do as the inquisitor desired or she would be cooked in the pan.

Needless to say, as soon as she was invited, she jumped into bed with the priest, and preserved her life. After a few days living like a queen, she was taken to the cells and met the rest of the seraglio, the oldest of whom was 24. Now she was fed plain food, and learned the stories of the others. The girls were colour coded for the three inquisitors, and dined in the hall from time to time when the priest selected them for the night. When any of them got pregnant, they were cared for by the maids until the child was born, then they never saw it again. Each year about five or six of the girls disappeared, presumed murdered, but the numbers stayed roughly the same because others were admitted. All the girls could do was pray to the Christian God whose agents on earth were causing their misery!

Centers of the Inquisition

The methods of the Inquisition spread to all countries from Italy in the thirteenth century until by the beginning of the seventeenth century only the Scandinavian countries did not use torture. The chief scene of the Inquisitions activity was Central and Southern Europe—Southern France, North Italy, and Germany. The Scandinavian countries were spared altogether. It appears in England only on the occasion of the trial of the Templars, nor was it known in Castile and Portugal until the accession of Ferdinand and Isabella. It was introduced into the Netherlands with the Spanish domination, while in Northern France it was relatively little known.

The Iron Slipper
An Englishwoman was married to a Portuguese man called Vasconcellos and lived with him in Madeira. She was charged with heresy in 1704 and sent to the Inquisition in Lisbon. She pleaded she was innocent of any crime and refused to sign a confession, so she was kept on a dungeon sleeping on damp straw and fed on nothing but bread and water for 9½ months. In this time, she was whipped with knotted cords on several occasions. She also had her breasts burnt with a red hot iron in three places, and the wounds left untreated. Finally she was fixed rigidly in an iron chair in the torture chamber and was fitted on her left foot with an iron shoe. The shoe had however been heated red hot, and it was left in place until it cooled burning the flesh to the bone. She had passed out, but was revived and flogged mercilessly until her back from shoulders to waist was a mass of torn flesh. The torturers then began to heat the iron slipper for the right foot, when she agreed to sign the confession.

The apologists try, as ever, to have their cake and eat it. O’Brien boasts that though the medieval Catholic Church flourished in England, Scandinavia, northern Europe, and eastern Europe, in Ireland and Scotland, the Inquisition never existed in these areas. The Church certainly had religious jurisdiction over these places, but what they often lacked was a compliant secular arm. O’Brien concludes that “the Inquisition does not prove the Church to be false, but only that there are some misguided people within her courtyards”.

The Inquisition weighed heavily on Italy (especially Lombardy), on Southern France (in particular the country of Toulouse and in Languedoc) and in the Kingdom of Aragon and on Germany. Honorius IV (1285-87) introduced it into Sardinia, and in the fifteenth century it displayed excessive zeal in Flanders and Bohemia. Robert le Bougre, a Catharist convert to Christianity and subsequently a Dominican, yielded to a blind fanaticism and provoked unjust executions. But Peter de Rosa, an ex-priest, in Vicars of Christ maintains that inquisitors should not be thought of as being all greedy and psychopathic:

The most frightening of the inquisitors were the incorruptible ones—they tortured purely and simply for the love of God. They had no financial interest… they acted solely for the good of the cause. The very asceticism of most of these pious God-fearing Dominicans made them pathologically harsh. Used to pain themselves, they had a spiritual yearning to inflict pain on others. The screams of their victims were a kind of theological music to their ears, a proof that Satan was taking a pasting. They also rejoiced like children at the pope’s benevolence towards them. He gave them the same indulgences he gave the knights who went to the crusades.

When secular rulers resisted the harsh methods of the Inquisition, popes pressured them by excommunicating the rulers and placing their subjects under interdict. Interdict meant that no religious services or sacraments were allowed, including communion, confession, marriages, and Christian burial. In Italy, the church’s full involvement was exposed by a bull of pope Leo X (1513-21) in 1521. The secular arm of Venice, the Senate, had refused to approve the executions ordered by the Inquisition. The pope wrote to his legate:

We declare and order you to exhort and command the aforesaid Senate of Venice, their Doge and his officials, to intervene no more in this kind of trial, but promptly, without changing or inspecting the sentences made by the ecclesiastical judges, to execute the sentences which they are enjoined to carry out. And if they neglect or refuse, you are to compel them with the Church’s censure and other appropriate legal measures. From this order there is no appeal.

In 1542, Paul III (1534-1549) assigned the medieval Inquisition to the Congregation of the Inquisition, or Holy Office. This institution, which became known as the Roman Inquisition, was intended to combat Protestantism, but it is perhaps best known historically for its condemnation of Galileo. After the Second Vatican Conference, it was replaced (1965) by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the faith, which governs vigilance in matters of faith.

Speaking a heresy was bad enough but writing it was truly dangerous. In 1545, the Inquisition published an index of prohibited books. The Index included all of the books of the Protestant Reformers, as well as Protestant Bibles. Every book was carefully examined for the slightest supposed contempt of the Church. Censorship was at three levels:

  1. Complete suppression of a whole book.
  2. Expurgating objectionable pragraphs or chapters.
  3. Correction of sentences.

Those who published censored books would at least be imprisoned for life in the Inquisition’s cells. A list of books under each heading was published every years, so no one had the excuse of not knowing what had been placed on the Index. It was heresy to own any book that was banned or unexpurgated. Reading one of these books put Catholics in danger of damnation. In Spain, owning one of these banned books was punishable by death. The list of forbidden books was kept current until pope Paul VI (1963-1978) abolished the Index in 1959.

Support Us!
Buy a Book

Support independent publishers and writers snubbed by big retailers.
Ask your public library to order these books.
Available through all good bookshops

Get them cheaper
Direct Order Form
Get them cheaper


© All rights reserved

Who Lies Sleeping?

Who Lies Sleeping? cover
Who Lies Sleeping?
The Dinosaur Heritage and the Extinction of Man
ISBN 0-9521913-0-X £7.99

The Mystery of Barabbas

Mystery of Barabbas cover
The Mystery of Barabbas.
Exploring the Origins of a Pagan Religion
ISBN 0-9521913-1-8 £9.99

The Hidden Jesus

Hidden Jesus cover
The Hidden Jesus.
The Secret Testament Revealed
ISBN 0-9521913-2-6 £12.99

These pages are for use!

Creative Commons License
This work by Dr M D Magee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.askwhy.co.uk/.

This material may be freely used except to make a profit by it! Articles on this website are published and © Mike Magee and AskWhy! Publications except where otherwise attributed. Copyright can be transferred only in writing: Library of Congress: Copyright Basics.

Conditions

Permission to copy for personal use is granted. Teachers and small group facilitators may also make copies for their students and group members, providing that attribution is properly given. When quoting, suggested attribution format:

Author, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Page Title”, Updated: day, month, year, www .askwhy .co .uk / subdomains / page .php

Adding the date accessed also will help future searches when the website no longer exists and has to be accessed from archives… for example…

Dr M D Magee, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Sun Gods as Atoning Saviours” Updated: Monday, May 07, 2001, www.askwhy .co .uk / christianity / 0310sungod .php (accessed 5 August, 2007)

Electronic websites please link to us at http://www.askwhy.co.uk or to major contents pages, if preferred, but we might remove or rename individual pages. Pages may be redisplayed on the web as long as the original source is clear. For commercial permissions apply to AskWhy! Publications.

All rights reserved.
Website Summary

AskWhy! Blogger

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Add Feed to Google
The Wisdom of Carl
Carl Sagan (Demon Haunted World) invites us to accept that he has a dragon in his garage, but only he can see it. He asks what’s the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all. If there’s no way to disprove the dragon, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say it exists? Failure to disprove the dragon does not mean it exists. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I’m asking you to do is to believe, with no evidence, on my say-so. What is he getting at?