The Modern Era: Delusions and the Fallibility of Religion
Abstract
Toynbee reminds us an old and persistent view is that Christianity was the destroyer of the civilization it grew up in. Gibbon thought so. James Frazer did, Julian the Apostate did, and Toynbee joins Gibbon in supposing Marcus Aurelius perhaps did too. But Toynbee keeps persuading us history shows Christianity is eternal. Civilization is the means and religion is the end. A civilization may break down and break up, but the replacement of one higher religion by another will not be a necessary consequence. Christianity will endure and grow in wisdom and stature as the result of a fresh experience of secular catastrophe. Toynbee sees Christianity as the spiritual heir of all religions. Modern Day Christianity 2010 AW! Guide. Links to the principle AW! pages on it.
How the Japanese rulers manufactured a religion to serve their own purposes, Mikado-worship. Bushido was unknown until the end of the nineteenth century! The word appears in no dictionary before the year 1900. Japan had its chivalrous people but Bushido, as an institution or a code of rules, had never existed. The Japanese ruling class built a new religion for the Japanese. The new Japanese religion of loyalty and patriotism emerged into the light of day, and the feats accomplished during the last war show that the simple ideal which it offered was capable of inspiring heroic deeds, and foul ones too. How could a foreigner imagine that people who made such positive statements about their own country were merely exploiting credulity? Onlookers had no reason to suspect, and even if they did, original sources were out of their reach. What Christians and Jews do not or will not accept is that their own religions were no less phony.
The comet was the ultimate sign of the times. It signified the end of the world for the believers. That the signs of the times told of the end of the world was the belief of the Essenes at the time of Jesus and it was the belief of the first Christians who adopted much of Essene philosophy. Everyone would die except for the saved, the perfectly holy people—the Essenes initially, then the Christians. A characteristic of these cults is the cult of personality of some charismatic leader, almost invariably male, who uses the childish naievety of his followers to boost his own ego, status and lifestyle.
“In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth” on October 23, 4004 BC. That is what Archbishop James Ussher says in Annals of the World, first published in Latin in 1654, then in English in 1658. The book is popular with fundamentalist Christians for whom it is a chronology of the world based on biblical revelation rather than the false science of evolution.
Toynbee reminds us an old and persistent view is that Christianity was the destroyer of the civilization it grew up in. Gibbon thought so. James Frazer did, Julian the Apostate did, and Toynbee joins Gibbon in supposing Marcus Aurelius perhaps did too. But Toynbee keeps persuading us history shows Christianity is eternal. Civilization is the means and religion is the end. A civilization may break down and break up, but the replacement of one higher religion by another will not be a necessary consequence. Christianity will endure and grow in wisdom and stature as the result of a fresh experience of secular catastrophe. Toynbee sees Christianity as the spiritual heir of all religions.
Christians have been desperate to distance themselves from European fascism and Nazism, and apologists like to argue that fascist leaders were not practising Christians. Yet, all the Nazi leaders were born, baptized, and raised Christian, mainly in authoritarian, pious households where tolerance and democratic values were not valued. Catholic Nazis, besides Hitler, included Heinrich Himmler, Reinhard Heydrich, and Joseph Goebbels. Hermann Goering had mixed Catholic-Protestant parentage, while Rudolf Hess, Martin Bormann, Albert Speer, and Adolf Eichmann had Protestant backgrounds. Roughly two-thirds of German Christians repeatedly voted for candidates who promised to overthrow democracy. Protestants had given the Nazi party its main backing leading up to 1933. Evangelical youth was especially pro-Nazi. 90 percent of Protestant university theologians supported the Nazis. Christians were Nazis and took part in Nazi atrocities. Any who turned to outright criticism of fascism made their last appeals from the death cell.
New. No comments posted here yet. Be the first one!
Before you go, think about this…
“The main objective of my writing today is to nail the lie that to reject Zionism as it is practised today is in effect to be anti-semitic, to be an inheritor of Hitler’s racism. That argument, with the Holocaust in the background, is nothing other than moral blackmail. It is highly effective. It condemns many to silence who fear to be thought anti-semitic. They are often the very opposite. They are often people whose heart bleeds at Israel’s betrayal of its true heritage. When world Jewry defends Israeli policies right or wrong, then anger turns not only against Israel but against all Jews. I wish it was mere rhetoric to say that Israeli politics today make a holocaust the day after tomorrow credible.”
Canon Paul Oestreicher, a refugee from Nazi Germany
Support independent publishers and writers snubbed by big retailers. Ask your public library to order these books.
Available through all good bookshops
Permission to copy for personal use is granted. Teachers and small group facilitators may also make copies for their students and group members, providing that attribution is properly given. When quoting, suggested attribution format:
Adding the date accessed also will help future searches when the website no longer exists and has to be accessed from archives… for example…
Dr M D Magee, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Sun Gods as Atoning Saviours” Updated: Monday, May 07, 2001, www.askwhy .co .uk / christianity / 0310sungod .php (accessed 5 August, 2007)
Electronic websites please link to us at http://www.askwhy.co.uk or to major contents pages, if preferred, but we might remove or rename individual pages. Pages may be redisplayed on the web as long as the original source is clear. For commercial permissions apply to AskWhy! Publications.
Science requires the most vigorous and uncompromising scepticism, because the vast majority of ideas are simply wrong, and the only way to winnow the wheat from the chaff is by critical experiment and analysis. If you’re open to the point of gullibility and have not a microgram of sceptical sense in you, then you cannot distinguish the promising ideas from the worthless ones. Uncritically accepting every proffered notion, idea and hypothesis is tantamount to knowing nothing. Ideas contradict one another. Only through sceptical scrutiny can we decide among them.