Last Year in Marienbad

AskWhy! Marienbad Muser Plot Generator

Abstract

Gozzi, the author of Turandot, according to Goethe, had found 36 tragic, by which he meant dramatic, situations, but he never published them. In 1921, George Polti, a French academic in his fifties, claimed to have rediscovered these 36 plots. He maintained they correspond to the no more than 36 emotions, which he believed humans can experience. PoltiPlot is presented elsewhere but here is a refinement, an indulgence. Polti in Marienbad! It serves the same purpose, but is set Last Year in Marienbad, also simulated in these pages.
Page Tags: Plot, Generator, Plot Generator, Story Generator, George Polti, 36 Dramatic Situations, Last Year in Marienbad
Site Tags: Conjectures Deuteronomic history Truth Persecution CGText Joshua contra Celsum svg art the cross The Star Marduk Site A-Z dhtml art tarot God’s Truth Christendom
Loading
In dark ages people are best guided by religion, as in a pitch-black night a blind man is the best guide; he knows the roads and paths better than a man who can see. When daylight comes, however, it is foolish to use blind, old men as guides.
Heinrich Heine

© 1998 The Adelphiasophists and AskWhy! Publications. Freely distribute as long as it is unaltered and properly attributed
Contents Updated: Saturday, 9 August 2008

The Marienbad Muser Story Teller

As we have already said in connexion with PoltiPlot, if a computer could write you a story, then you as a storyteller are redundant. These pages are to stimulate your thinking, and help you overcome writer’s block. The plot outliner simply juxtaposes, not in any logical way, some Polti categories to give you ideas for plots. By merging with the Marienbad simulation, the musings of the Polti plot muser bring a degree more unity into the schema which emerges, but not much. It simply helps to remind us or convince ourselves that the attempt is to suggest one story, not several. The logic of your own story is your’s, but an exercise in creativity is to take one of these pages, and to force yourself to make a story, using the elements suggested, it being your choice, of course, what you consider the primary plot and what the subplots.

It seems so long ago…Ah, now I am beginning to remember. The hero and heroine face an obstacle to their love—social class—young people often seek older lovers, those in middle years seek lovers roughly equal in age, older people often love younger people, though socially inferior, their temperaments, and so on. Almost any story will have a love angle. Love is not a plot because it is not dramatic. The plot is introduced by obstacles to love, or in other ways. The example is that the love match is hindered by one of them being thought to be married. Perhaps he—or she—might have neglected a favorite. Did they plan to elope together? Did you and I? Eventually you agreed. And we tried (was it once more?) to leave together. In the end you were ready to leave the hotel with me. I needed something—or did he?—some object to be gained by whatever means was necessary… eloquence in the face of someone, who was refusing to help. Didn't he try to use skills as an arbitrator in a dialectic contest of violent passion, like… like a courtroom drama. I seemed trapped in the procedure. Was there a way out? Could the situation be salvaged? Was I losing? Did I lose? Or succeed? Can I persuade you? Such grandeur, such elegance, so many charming high society people to mix with, converse with, enjoy the company of, yet the overwheming feeling here is one of loneliness—intolerable loneliness and isolation. It is as if an invisible barrier separates us.

You might like…



Last uploaded: 20 December, 2010.

Short Responses and Suggestions

* Required.  No spam




New. No comments posted here yet. Be the first one!

Other Websites or Blogs

Before you go, think about this…

According to “The Teleological Argument for God”, Nature is so wonderful, works so well, and is so orderly that it can only have been designed. There must therefore have been a designer, and it must have been God. David Hume pointed out that something appearing to be designed does not necessitate that it has been designed. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution explained why life forms could become very sophisticated and thus seem to have been designed. Moreover, if the designer is God, He has designed a lot of imperfection and cruelty into his plan for Nature. It is not compatible with the assumed nature of the Christian God. The God who designed Nature was not a very intelligent god, and was not a merciful god. What advantage is there in the suffering of millions of animals throughout time? Epicurus said:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is not benevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence evil?

Support Us!
Buy a Book

Support independent publishers and writers snubbed by big retailers.
Ask your public library to order these books.
Available through all good bookshops

Get them cheaper
Direct Order Form
Get them cheaper


© All rights reserved

Who Lies Sleeping?

Who Lies Sleeping?
The Dinosaur Heritage and the Extinction of Man
ISBN 0-9521913-0-X £7.99

The Mystery of Barabbas

The Mystery of Barabbas.
Exploring the Origins of a Pagan Religion
ISBN 0-9521913-1-8 £9.99

The Hidden Jesus

The Hidden Jesus.
The Secret Testament Revealed
ISBN 0-9521913-2-6 £12.99

These pages are for use!

Creative Commons License
This work by Dr M D Magee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.askwhy.co.uk/.

This material may be freely used except to make a profit by it! Articles on this website are published and © Mike Magee and AskWhy! Publications except where otherwise attributed. Copyright can be transferred only in writing: Library of Congress: Copyright Basics.

Conditions

Permission to copy for personal use is granted. Teachers and small group facilitators may also make copies for their students and group members, providing that attribution is properly given. When quoting, suggested attribution format:

Author, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Page Title”, Updated: day, month, year, www .askwhy .co .uk / subdomains / page .php

Adding the date accessed also will help future searches when the website no longer exists and has to be accessed from archives… for example…

Dr M D Magee, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Sun Gods as Atoning Saviours” Updated: Monday, May 07, 2001, www.askwhy .co .uk / christianity / 0310sungod .php (accessed 5 August, 2007)

Electronic websites please link to us at http://www.askwhy.co.uk or to major contents pages, if preferred, but we might remove or rename individual pages. Pages may be redisplayed on the web as long as the original source is clear. For commercial permissions apply to AskWhy! Publications.

All rights reserved.

AskWhy! Blogger

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Add Feed to Google

Website Summary