This Month
Date 15-03-2010
GMTime 06:58:31
Banner header
Styled Plain

Our brains seem to have overdeveloped for some reason—only a part is used.
Who Lies Sleeping?

The Nature of a Perfect God and His Creation

Page Tags: Evil, God, Nature, Nothing, Perfect, Time, World,
Site Tags: Christendom Jesus Essene morality Site A-Z Marduk CGText tarot contra Celsum Joshua argue Judaism dhtml art Christianity Truth inquisition the cross
Loading
Post to StumbleUpon Post to BlogMarks Post to Del.icio.us Post to Fark Post to Furl Post to Google Post to MyWeb Post to Netscape Post to NetVouz Post to Newsvine Post to Reddit Post to Scuttle Post to Shadows Post to Simpy Post to Slashdot Post to Spurl Post to Technorati Post to Wists

Abstract

Nothing in God’s timeless world can work, because work requires time. Nothing can operate because all operations require changes to happen. God cannot think, because thought requires changes in the thinker. So, a timeless God cannot think into being time, and the changing world that accompanies it. Nor could a perfect entity. To be perfect everything for the perfect being must be fulfilled, and so there could be nothing that would cause anything else to be brought into being. If God is perfect, then He can have had no desires, because desiring something proves He is incomplete and therefore imperfect. A perfect God could not, therefore, have ever decided to create nature. God cannot have felt lonely and wanted to create a temporal world full of playthings called men because it implies he was never perfect in the first place, and having introduced evil into the world He had created, he proved it.

© Dr M D Magee
Contents Updated: Friday, July 30, 1999
September 2004

Contradictory and Incoherent

Christians use God to explain some mystery or other, usually “mysteries” of their own incoherent religion—the resurrection, religious experience, morality, the origin of the universe, nature. God is a mystery they do not include, they take it for granted, but quite apart from how one mystery explains another one, the proposed explanation must be coherent. The qualities attributed to God are incoherent and cannot be simultaneously true. If a God correctly foresees events—and how can a perfect being not foresee things correctly?—then they must be predetermined, but if humanity is responsible for them through their free will, then events cannot be predetermined. These attributes are contradictory, and so incoherent.

God cannot be omniscient. Some Christians now are beginning to think that the attributes God has traditionally had cannot be reconciled and God’s nature needs revising. So much then for His constancy! If God is eternal, time must not exist for Him. If God is eternally perfect, change is impossible for Him. God is therefore a static entity, immoveable and immutable because to move or to change requires time and implies imperfection. That is why the evil god, Satan, is properly identified with time. Time causes corruption and ultimately death, so Satan is time, and, for death to be defeated, time—Satan—must be defeated first.

Nothing in God’s timeless world can work, because work requires time. Nothing can operate because all operations require changes to happen. God cannot think, because thought requires changes in the thinker. So, a timeless God cannot think into being time, and the changing world that accompanies it. Nor could a perfect entity. To be perfect everything for the perfect being must be fulfilled, and so there could be nothing that would cause anything else to be brought into being. If God is perfect, then He can have had no desires, because desiring something proves He is incomplete and therefore imperfect. A perfect God could not, therefore, have ever decided to create nature. God cannot have felt lonely and wanted to create a temporal world full of playthings called men because it implies he was never perfect in the first place, and having introduced evil into the world He had created, he proved it.

In the ninth century AD, Ohrmazddadan, a Zoroastrian theologian wrote:

It is explicitly revealed that there are two original principles, no others. Furthermore, good cannot arise from evil, nor evil from good. Thus, it should be understood that something completely perfect in terms of goodness cannot produce evil. If it could then it is not perfect, because when something is defined as perfect there is no place for anything else. When there is no place for anything else, nothing else can arise from it. Since God is perfect in terms of goodness and wisdom, evil and ignorance cannot arise from God. If it were possible then God would not be perfect, and if God were not perfect and good it would not be possible to praise him as the righteous creator.

God Himself must have had within Him, as part of His being, the creation of time. So, if time is evil as the cause of all change and therefore corruption and death, God cannot have been perfect, ever. He contained evil in His very being. Even so, there is no way the perfect static timeless God could will time to begin. It must have been a purely random event like atomic radiation. God or no God, creation just happened!

Last uploaded: 04 November, 2009.

Interact

Other Websites or Blogs

Short Responses and Suggestions

* Required.  No spam




New. No comments posted here yet. Be the first one!

Before you go, think about this…

George Eliot, arguably the best nineteenth century women novelist, was among those who thought Christianity immoral. God behaved like a “revengeful tyrant”, and that was plainly unethical. The doctrine of “original sin” means God punishes people for something that they are born with as ordinary human beings. What sort of God decides upon this unfair punishment then decided to punish his son instead?

Who is God? Paul or Christ?

Give or take a few, it’s been 23771 months since the first coming of Christ ended. The Rapture can’t be long now… Can it?

AskWhy! Books

Support independent publishers and writers snubbed by big retailers.
Ask your public library to order these books.
Available through all good bookshops

Get them cheaper
Direct Order Form
Get them cheaper


© All rights reserved

Who Lies Sleeping?

Who Lies Sleeping? cover
Who Lies Sleeping?
The Dinosaur Heritage and the Extinction of Man
ISBN 0-9521913-0-X £7.99

The Mystery of Barabbas

Mystery of Barabbas cover
The Mystery of Barabbas.
Exploring the Origins of a Pagan Religion
ISBN 0-9521913-1-8 £9.99

The Hidden Jesus

Hidden Jesus cover
The Hidden Jesus.
The Secret Testament Revealed
ISBN 0-9521913-2-6 £12.99

These pages are for use!

Creative Commons License
This work by Dr M D Magee is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.askwhy.co.uk/.

This material may be freely used except to make a profit by it! Articles on this website are published and © Mike Magee and AskWhy! Publications except where otherwise attributed. Copyright can be transferred only in writing: Library of Congress: Copyright Basics.

Conditions

Permission to copy for personal use is granted. Teachers and small group facilitators may also make copies for their students and group members, providing that attribution is properly given. When quoting, suggested attribution format:

Author, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Page Title”, Updated: day, month, year, www .askwhy .co .uk / subdomains / page .php

Adding the date accessed also will help future searches when the website no longer exists and has to be accessed from archives… for example…

Dr M D Magee, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Sun Gods as Atoning Saviours” Updated: Monday, May 07, 2001, www.askwhy .co .uk / christianity / 0310sungod .php (accessed 5 August, 2007)

Electronic websites please link to us at http://www.askwhy.co.uk or to major contents pages, if preferred, but we might remove or rename individual pages. Pages may be redisplayed on the web as long as the original source is clear. For commercial permissions apply to AskWhy! Publications.

All rights reserved.
▼ Contract All | ▲ Expand All

Website Summary

Themes

Exodus

The Resurrection

Evolution

Search

Popularity


AskWhy! Blogger

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

My Blog Log

IP Address Lookup
Open Standards Add Feed to Google

Visitor Map
The Wisdom of Carl
If a given phenomenon can already be plausibly understood in terms of matter and energy, why should we hypothesize that something else, something for which there is as yet no other good evidence, is responsible?
Carl Sagan, The Demon Haunted World (1996)

Join the blue ribbon online free speech campaign
Join the blue ribbon online free speech campaign!