It seems to me a defect of our much famed Constitution to have to part with an admirable government like lord Salisbury´s for no reason of any importance, or any particular reason, merely on account of the number of votes.
Essentially science is a practical subject, and so lab and field work constitutes an important part of any science program. Do not skimp it, but use to to your own advantage, even if some of the student exercises seem tedious. At the very least be proud of accurate observation and recording of data.
A. Theory and Experiment
Science is both theoretical and practical
Theory and practice are intimately linked
theory arises out of practice
theory points to new practices
Experimental work, tackled with thought and a spirit of enquiry, will give you a deeper understanding of any scientific subject.
You might be tempted to treat practical work light-heartedly—Don’t:
you must pass the practical examination
otherwise you will fail fully to appreciate theory
practical situations are increasingly a feature or the theoretical papers.
if you have learned nothing from a practical period you have been just wasting your time!
Nevertheless your practical handouts will not always include detailed theory.
Part of your scientific training is to refer to relevant sources of infonnation
It is up to you to look up background information before an experiment and to seek explanations afterwards:
in textbooks
in references provided
in journals.
B. Stages of a Practical
Pre-laboratory—previous night:
read the experimental handout/reference
make sure you understand the purpose of the experirnent
consider the experimental details:
note the possible hazards
analyse into separate steps
make a flow chart
know the reason for each step
do you need to select or devise any procedures in addition to those given?
check what data are required
do any preliminary or control experiments need to be done
what are the limitations and sources of error? how can they be minimised?
do any problems remain?—note them.
prepare your lab notebook
fresh page—date title
write down the object of the experiment
draw the flow chart
make notes of details/problems
prepare tables for results.
In the laboratory:
Before starting the experiment:
put on your lab-coat
ask the tutor about any difficulties
check that the apparatus/materials are available—if not, see the technician
check that no changes in procedtre have been made
assemble the apparatus—is it correctly functioning?
if in doubt—ask the tutor.
During the experiment:
BE SAFETY CONSCIOUS
work individually for all qualitative/volurnetric analysis and observation experiments—if necessary work in pairs for more complicated preparations and physical chemistry experiments
take care when hand1ing:
materials—hazards and economy, don’t use too much
apparatus—often fragile—look after it
time—speed but not haste
make observations accurately—record them precisely
note any snags and how you overcome them
don’t change the procedure without informing the tutor—record all such changes
keep thinking!
Never act the fool, especially where there are dangerous chemicals or apparatus
After the experiment:
clear your bench
make sure it is free from spillages, clean and dry
check the contents of your cupboard.
Post-laboratory:
analyse the data
classify and/or tabulate results
plot graphs
do calculations
derive desired results—are they sensible?
interpret the results and draw conclusions
assess validity and reliability
suggest improvements
write up:
use your original notes—lab notebook
refer to further handouts on practical work.
You should develop a pride in doing precise work and recording it objectively. Always therefore record work as you do it in a notebook and be aware of possible sources of error, and possible hazards to yourself and to others.
New. No comments posted here yet. Be the first one!
Before you go, think about this…
Films like the “Jesus family tomb” will always get lots of attention. Those involved will find no shortage of money to continue their “research”. The media coverage will ensure the research is funded, so the film makers will answer any questions posed, making more money. Offended Christians will continue to find fault with the research, and frankly will most often be right. But if anything genuine was discovered on these lines, backed with faultless evidence, no Christians will concede that it proves their religion is flawed. The evidence we have hugely weighs against Christian belief, but they controvert even incontrovertable evidence on the grounds of faith. No matter how good the science presented to fundamentalists, they will always find something wrong with it and use a mockery of science to make their own feeble “refutation”.
Support independent publishers and writers snubbed by big retailers. Ask your public library to order these books.
Available through all good bookshops
Permission to copy for personal use is granted. Teachers and small group facilitators may also make copies for their students and group members, providing that attribution is properly given. When quoting, suggested attribution format:
Adding the date accessed also will help future searches when the website no longer exists and has to be accessed from archives… for example…
Dr M D Magee, AskWhy! Publications Website, “Sun Gods as Atoning Saviours” Updated: Monday, May 07, 2001, www.askwhy .co .uk / christianity / 0310sungod .php (accessed 5 August, 2007)
Electronic websites please link to us at http://www.askwhy.co.uk or to major contents pages, if preferred, but we might remove or rename individual pages. Pages may be redisplayed on the web as long as the original source is clear. For commercial permissions apply to AskWhy! Publications.
The chemist Linus Pauling (1901-94) was, more than any other person, responsible for the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, which halted above-ground explosions of nuclear weapons by the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom. He mounted a blistering campaign of moral outrage and scientific data, made more credible by the fact that he was a Nobel laureate. In the American press, he was generally vilified for his troubles, and in the 1950s the State Department cancelled his passport because he had been insufficiently anti-communist.